
What does “effective communication” mean under ADA Title III for retail stores and dispensaries? Learn what staff must do, when auxiliary aids are required, what you cannot refuse, and how to avoid disability discrimination complaints in NY and NYC.
Under ADA Title III, public accommodations must ensure communication with people with disabilities is as effective as communication with others.
Dispensaries are retail stores open to the public. ADA applies.
Effective communication applies to:
It is not limited to physical access.
Auxiliary aids and services are tools or support used to ensure effective communication.
Examples include:
The type of aid required depends on:
The goal is equal access to information.
Staff may not:
The business—not the customer—is responsible for ensuring effective communication.
An interpreter may be required when communication is:
Examples in a dispensary setting:
Brief interactions (such as a simple transaction) may not require an interpreter if written communication works effectively.
The determination must be individualized.
A business does not have to provide an auxiliary aid if it would create an undue burden.
Undue burden means:
The analysis considers:
Undue burden is a high threshold and cannot be assumed.
If one method is too burdensome, the business must look for an alternative that still ensures effective communication.
Customer who is deaf requests help understanding product options.
Staff should determine whether written communication is sufficient. If not, further assistance may be required.
Customer who is blind requests access to product information.
Printed-only menus may not be sufficient. Digital access compatible with screen readers may be required.
Customer with speech disability uses assistive technology.
Staff must allow time and not dismiss communication attempts.
In NYC, the Human Rights Law requires “full and equal enjoyment” of public accommodations.
NYC enforcement can include:
NYC may interpret obligations broadly.
Staff conduct is often the basis of complaints.
Communication failures create legal exposure even when architecture is compliant.
Effective communication is an operational issue, not just a legal one.